The Media Association of Trinidad and Tobago (MATT) takes note of the statement issued by Director of Public Prosecutions Roger Gaspard, SC, cautioning against the publication of material that could prejudice criminal proceedings related to the death of Joshua Samaroo and the serious injury of Kaia Sealy. MATT stands firmly on the side of the rule of law.

We recognise that the right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal is a cornerstone of our democracy.

We also recognise that Trinidad and Tobago’s legal system provides different options for the conduct of criminal trials such as judge alone trials.

At the same time, it is important to note that these proceedings remain at an early stage.

The trial has not yet begun, and at the time of the DPP’s statement, warrants had been issued but the accused had not yet been formally arrested and brought before the court.

As an association representing professional journalists and news organisations, MATT wishes to draw a distinction between responsible journalism and commentary circulating on social media platforms.

While social media discussion may form part of the broader public conversation, MATT can only speak on behalf of established newsrooms and journalists who operate within recognised professional and legal standards.

Professional journalists in Trinidad and Tobago are well aware of the legal principles surrounding contempt of court and the responsibilities that accompany coverage of criminal matters.

The extensive reporting on this case before charges were laid reflected the media’s duty to inform the public on an issue of significant public interest while investigations were being conducted by the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service (TTPS) and the Police Complaints Authority (PCA).

We acknowledge that the DPP has a constitutional responsibility to protect the integrity of criminal proceedings, just as the media has a constitutional responsibility to report matters of public interest fairly, accurately and responsibly.

At this time, MATT does not regard the DPP’s statement as intimidation or an attempt to interfere with legitimate journalism.

Rather, we view it as a reminder of the legal obligations that arise when criminal proceedings are underway.

The media will continue to report on developments in this matter in accordance with the law and the principles of open justice.

We remain committed to ensuring that the public is informed about court proceedings and matters of national importance while respecting the rights of all parties involved in the judicial process.

This MATT statement was issued on May 30, 2026.